

Learn more about Brodie's Research Database & AI Assistant 📄🔍
For MORE Run Smarter Resources 🏃♂️📚
- Including Free Injury Prevention Courses 🩹🎓
- The Run Smarter Book 📖
- Access to Research Papers 📄🔍
- & Ways to Work with Brodie 🤝👟
👉 CLICK HERE! 🎉✨
In this month’s Latest Running Research episode, Brodie breaks down three fascinating studies that challenge common beliefs and refine how runners should approach performance and injury prevention. First, a randomized controlled trial on ketone supplementation reveals that while ketones significantly improve cognitive function—helping with reaction time and mental clarity—they do not improve running performance, efficiency, or fuel utilization. Despite feeling better during efforts, runners didn’t run faster, and some even experienced gastrointestinal issues, raising questions about their real-world value for endurance athletes.
Next, Brodie explores a meta-analysis comparing high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs moderate continuous running (MICT). The key takeaway: HIIT is more effective at improving running economy (efficiency at submax speeds), particularly at moderate intensities, while steady running is better for improving VO₂ max (your aerobic engine). This reinforces the idea that both training styles serve different physiological purposes—and combining them strategically is the smartest approach for performance gains.
Finally, a newly released review challenges one of the most common rehab narratives: that weak glutes cause poor running mechanics. Across 19 studies, there was no consistent link between hip strength and running biomechanics, and even strengthening programs failed to meaningfully change running form. Instead, Brodie reframes strength training as a way to increase load capacity, not “fix” technique—highlighting the importance of gait retraining and smart load management over blindly strengthening muscles.
🎯 Key Takeaways